Additional file 2: of COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time

Goldacre, BORCID logo; Drysdale, H; Dale, A; Milosevic, I; Slade, E; Hartley, P; Marston, CORCID logo; Powell-Smith, A; Heneghan, C and Mahtani, KR (2019). Additional file 2: of COMPare: a prospective cohort study correcting and monitoring 58 misreported trials in real time. [Dataset]. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7717361.v1
Copy

Discrepancies between pre-specified and reported outcomes are an important source of bias in trials. Despite legislation, guidelines and public commitments on correct reporting from journals, outcome misreporting continues to be prevalent. We aimed to document the extent of misreporting, establish whether it was possible to publish correction letters on all misreported trials as they were published, and monitor responses from editors and trialists to understand why outcome misreporting persists despite public commitments to address it.

Keywords

Outcomes; Misreporting; Trials; CONSORT; Audit; ICMJE; Editorial conduct

No files available. Please consult associated links.


EndNote BibTeX Reference Manager Refer Atom Dublin Core (with Type as Type) JSON Multiline CSV RDF+N-Triples HTML Citation EP3 XML OpenURL ContextObject RDF+N3 MPEG-21 DIDL ASCII Citation MODS Simple Metadata OPENAIRE RDF+XML OpenURL ContextObject in Span Data Cite XML METS
Export